How old is lord rama




















This story is from November 8, This might change the way we look at history and religion. We might refuse to begin reading Indian history from that comma, or hyphen called ''Indus Valley.

I am proud that we''re Indians and the products of one of the oldest civilisations. However, British rule changed us; we developed a sense of being somehow inferior. That would make Indian civilization only 3, years old. So, archaeology is not the only answer. There''s a lot of objective research of another kind that needs to be carried out in earnest. He acquired a software named Planetarium, used to predict planetary movements and configurations.

Then he moves ahead in the narrative. Valmiki Ramayan states Ram was years-old when he went to exile. When the configuration of planets described at this point is fed into the software, the date thrown up matches perfectly with Ram''s age at that juncture of his life - 25 years.

The software proves that on that given day there was indeed a solar eclipse with Mars in the middle. This solar eclipse and the particular configuration of planets could be seen from Panchavati longitude and latitude plainly shown in the software. Usually, one can see not more than 6 constellations at a given point of time. But since Hanuman was flying across, and it must have taken him approximately 4 hrs to get there, he could see 8 constellations - in two hours one constellation would have moved out of sight and another become visible.

So, in a period of 4 hrs he saw 8 constellations! Man or God There is an essential difference between the Valmiki Ramayana and the Tulsi Ramayana. In the last few years, some highly motivated computer-literate group of people have designed a software called 'Planetarium Gold Software' which is generally used by scientists to measure the distance and locations of planets from earth and to predict lunar and solar eclipses.

The Valmiki Ramayana Bal Kanda While they deserved all appreciation and thanks for this new approach, their ignorance of astronomical calculations and in the absence of any literary proof, their result cannot be relied upon. According to astronomy, the positions of zodiac constellations come back to their original place after a cycle of approximately 26, years.

For this reason, the exact same planetary position repeats itself every 26, years. So, Ram could have been born in any of the repetitive cycles in planetary positions. Even if we believe Ram to be born in the Treta of the present 28th Chaturyugi, as mentioned earlier, the position of constellations have completed 33 cycles and if, according to literary evidence, we believe Ram to be born in the Treta of 24th Chaturyugi, then the position of the constellations have completed cycles.

The scientific interpretation of the photographs of the remains of Adam's Bridge Ram Setu taken by NASA's [ Images ] Gemini spacecraft in , reveals that this ancient bridge linking India to Sri Lanka [ Images ] was manmade, and it was dated to be at least 1. According to Valmiki Ramayana, it is true that Ram and his engineers constructed this bridge for transporting his army into Lanka.

If we accept that it was indeed Ram who got this bridge constructed then he lived in the middle years of the 28th Treta, and not in the 24th, and neither in the transition between Treta and Dwapar of the 28th era Chaturyugi.

Even if we accept this, it doesn't alter the calculations based on planetary positions of the constellations. Then the constellations would have completed 66 cycles before coming back to its original position. It is also not wrong to state that an email message was sent by NASA officials in July to N K Raghupati, chairman of the Setu Samudram Ship Canal Project, stating therein that the remains of the bridge do not appear to be connected to any human activity.

Why NASA differed from its original stand is unknown. Even if Adam's Bridge is a natural geological formation, it could have been beautifully used by Ram to construct a temporary bridge for his army to cross over to Sri Lanka. No scientific test has yet been carried out to measure the ascending or descending contours of Adam's Bridge.

Moreover, after millions of years since its construction, no human activity can be linked to this or any other structure. Most foreign scholars and Indologists believe that Indians taught and learnt their lessons verbally, without the aid of any written material. Indians did not even know how to write. They were not inclined towards maintaining any historical records, nor did they have any notion of placement of events in its proper sequence in time.

They believed that the Aryans came from abroad, defeated the original inhabitants of India, the Dravidians, and settled here. The Harappan civilisation was destroyed by invading Aryans. The human history they know is only 5, years old. The ancestor of man was an ape or a chimpanzee. In brief it can be stated that all the above assertions of foreign scholars are unscientific, illogical, untrue and pure false propaganda.

It is the root of their religion and to show them what the root is, I feel sure is the only way of uprooting all that has sprung from it during the last three thousand years. Similarly, Monier-Williams wrote in the preface of his Sanskrit-English dictionary: 'I must draw attention to the fact that I am only the second occupant of the Boden Chair and that its founder Colonel Boden stated most explicitly in his will dated August 15, AD that the special object of his munificent bequest was to promote the translation of scriptures into English so as to enable his countrymen to proceed in the conversion of the natives of India to the Christian religion'.

Prof Goltuster had revealed that Roy, Weber, Whitling, Fuhan, and other scholars were determined because of some mysterious reason to ruin the prime glory of India in any way possible. The book states, 'Unlike in India, the academic study of religion is an important undertaking for intellectuals in America and a few hundred scholars study Hinduism and other Indian religions.

Many of them have continued to perpetuate myths and biases about Indian culture and religion through misinterpretation and mistranslations. These are in line with the colonial and missionary caricature of India.

Let us also know the fact that McCaulay did not know even one Indian language but he commented on all Eastern wisdom, James Mill never visited India but he wrote on Indian history. None of the foreign Indologists like Max Muller, Winternitz and Griffith had any knowledge of Vedic grammar , astronomy, metre chhand etc but they all translated Vedas and assumed the status of authorities. As per Vedic time computation and tradition, the age of creation is 4. They have kept intact the history of the time of creation and the advent of man on earth till today.

Man arrived on earth exactly 1,97,29,49, years ago approximately two billion years ago. Some Vedic scholars also believe that man was created on earth only in the seventh manmantar of Vaivasvat Manu. The sun, planets, stars, earth, sea, vegetation, flora and fauna were created in the earlier six manmantar s in a very scientific manner. If we accept this theory, then man was born about 12,05,33, years ago. At least this much is certain, that the history of mankind is indeed very long. Indians always knew the art of writing.

The Rig Veda Script was in vogue since ancient times in India. Bhojpatra and tadpatra papyrus were abundantly available in nature before man walked the earth. Like paper, even these forms of recording scripts was not permanent. Manuscripts were copied onto new papyrus if they got damaged due to climatic conditions.

How else would we find thousands of ancient manuscripts in India? How else would we remember the Vedas, epics, scriptures, and other astronomical subjects? Yes, there were definitely a few people who felt pride in memorising one or more of the Vedas. If we believe that at that point in time the intellect and memory of the people were very sharp and elephantine compared to the modern man, then this logic also goes against the evolutionary principles of Darwin.

The truth is that Indians knew how to write -- and wrote a lot! No other country in the world has such a rich and vast literary treasure. What other proof can be asked for to say that the Indians could write? Darwin's unnatural and unscientific theory is now also being rejected by many scientists and scholars world-wide.

Because of their religious faith some Western scholars who earlier believed that the age of the earth was approximately 6, years, now agree that the earth is aged between 3. Subscribe Now. Your Subscription Plan Cancel Subscription. Home India News Entertainment. HT Insight. My Account. Sign in. Sign out.



0コメント

  • 1000 / 1000